RPI inflation, 1993 to July 2026

£1,000 in 1993 is £2,979 today

That £1,000 bought 654 pints of lager in 1993. Today it buys 193.

Prices up 198%3.3% a year on averageMultiply by 2.98

Measured with the Retail Prices Index, the only official series that runs back to 1948. Use CPI instead.

£1 in 1993£2.98 today
It takes 3.0 of today's pounds to match one from 1993
The card that appears when you share this link

What £1,000 buys

Official average shop prices, not a basket. Things marked as outrunning inflation got dearer faster than everything else; things that lagged got relatively cheaper.

Item1993Today
pints of lager£1.53 then, about £5.17 today654193
first-class stampsoutran inflation20p then, £1.80 today5,000556
kg of bananaslagged inflation£1.00 then, about £1.09 today1,000917
packs of 20 cigarettesoutran inflation£2.24 then, about £17.76 today44656
kg of roasting chickenlagged inflation£2.10 then, about £4.04 today476247
pints of milklagged inflation34p then, about 70p today2,9151,439
dozen eggslagged inflation£1.10 then, about £2.38 today909421
nips of whiskyoutran inflation£1.06 then, about £4.17 today943240
boxes of tea bagslagged inflation£1.24 then, about £2.83 today806354
kg of rump steaklagged inflation£8.51 then, about £20.21 today11849
sliced white loaves55p then, about £1.50 today1,818668
litres of unleaded49p then, about £1.47 today2,041682
pints of bitter£1.36 then, about £4.07 today735246
Same money, adjusted for inflation£1,000£2,979

The ONS stopped publishing these average prices in January 2025. Today's figures are that last reading moved on with inflation, so treat them as close rather than exact.

Houses and wages

Inflation is one story. What people earned, and what a home cost, are the other two.

Average house
£51,211 → £278,784
Up 5.4×, against 3.0× for prices generally
Average pay
£12,402 → £39,260
A year's average earnings, up 3.2×
Years of pay for a house
4.1 → 7.1
Average house price divided by average annual pay
If it had tracked wages
£3,166
What £1,000 in 1993 would be today if it had grown with pay rather than prices