RPI inflation, 1995 to August 2026

£1,000 in 1995 is £2,828 today

That £1,000 bought 602 pints of lager in 1995. Today it buys 192.

Prices up 183%3.3% a year on averageMultiply by 2.83

Measured with the Retail Prices Index, the only official series that runs back to 1948. Use CPI instead.

£1 in 1995£2.83 today
It takes 2.8 of today's pounds to match one from 1995
The card that appears when you share this link

What £1,000 buys

Official average shop prices, not a basket. Things marked as outrunning inflation got dearer faster than everything else; things that lagged got relatively cheaper.

Item1995Today
pints of lager£1.66 then, about £5.20 today602192
first-class stampsoutran inflation25p then, £1.80 today4,000556
packs of 20 cigarettesoutran inflation£2.59 then, about £17.87 today38656
kg of bananaslagged inflation92p then, about £1.10 today1,087911
pints of milklagged inflation36p then, about 70p today2,7701,429
kg of roasting chickenlagged inflation£2.03 then, about £4.07 today493246
dozen eggslagged inflation£1.18 then, about £2.39 today847419
boxes of tea bagslagged inflation£1.30 then, about £2.84 today769352
nips of whiskyoutran inflation£1.17 then, about £4.20 today855238
kg of rump steaklagged inflation£8.57 then, about £20.33 today11749
litres of unleaded54p then, about £1.48 today1,852678
sliced white loaves52p then, about £1.51 today1,923664
pints of bitter£1.47 then, about £4.09 today680244
Same money, adjusted for inflation£1,000£2,828

The ONS stopped publishing these average prices in January 2025. Today's figures are that last reading moved on with inflation, so treat them as close rather than exact.

Houses and wages

Inflation is one story. What people earned, and what a home cost, are the other two.

Average house
£51,245 → £278,784
Up 5.4×, against 2.8× for prices generally
Average pay
£13,286 → £39,312
A year's average earnings, up 3.0×
Years of pay for a house
3.9 → 7.1
Average house price divided by average annual pay
If it had tracked wages
£2,959
What £1,000 in 1995 would be today if it had grown with pay rather than prices