RPI inflation, 1996 to August 2026

£1,000 in 1996 is £2,761 today

That £1,000 bought 578 pints of lager in 1996. Today it buys 192.

Prices up 176%3.4% a year on averageMultiply by 2.76

Measured with the Retail Prices Index, the only official series that runs back to 1948. Use CPI instead.

£1 in 1996£2.76 today
It takes 2.8 of today's pounds to match one from 1996
The card that appears when you share this link

What £1,000 buys

Official average shop prices, not a basket. Things marked as outrunning inflation got dearer faster than everything else; things that lagged got relatively cheaper.

Item1996Today
pints of lager£1.73 then, about £5.20 today578192
first-class stampsoutran inflation25p then, £1.80 today4,000556
packs of 20 cigarettesoutran inflation£2.73 then, about £17.87 today36656
kg of bananaslagged inflation93p then, about £1.10 today1,075911
dozen eggslagged inflation£1.36 then, about £2.39 today735419
kg of roasting chickenlagged inflation£2.29 then, about £4.07 today437246
pints of milklagged inflation36p then, about 70p today2,7861,429
boxes of tea bagslagged inflation£1.34 then, about £2.84 today746352
nips of whiskyoutran inflation£1.22 then, about £4.20 today820238
kg of rump steaklagged inflation£8.78 then, about £20.33 today11449
litres of unleaded56p then, about £1.48 today1,786678
pints of bitter£1.54 then, about £4.09 today649244
sliced white loaves55p then, about £1.51 today1,818664
Same money, adjusted for inflation£1,000£2,761

The ONS stopped publishing these average prices in January 2025. Today's figures are that last reading moved on with inflation, so treat them as close rather than exact.

Houses and wages

Inflation is one story. What people earned, and what a home cost, are the other two.

Average house
£53,394 → £278,784
Up 5.2×, against 2.8× for prices generally
Average pay
£13,770 → £39,312
A year's average earnings, up 2.9×
Years of pay for a house
3.9 → 7.1
Average house price divided by average annual pay
If it had tracked wages
£2,855
What £1,000 in 1996 would be today if it had grown with pay rather than prices